|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 01:52:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Ominus Decre
Originally by: Asheyla Vareen
GOOD! I'll do a happy little jig right here at my desk, then. Also, I want to also ask the devs not to make it a click to move type of ambulation. There is nothing more annoying on this planet than click to move functions. I would lobby for the more realistic WASD, or arrow key movement feature.
EDIT: And character names and corp/alliance tickers floating over their heads = please no.
I completely disagree. WASD controls would likely cause me to NEVER use an avatar function in EVE. For one, it's a total distraction from the core play style (point and click) interface that make up the game.
it would be more immersive and intuitive to the standard theme of the game to facilitate a point and click movement for avatars. Being able to click on an object which would then have your character move towards and interact would be move nicer then twitchy WASD controls.
Jumping, running, twitch WASD controls and random innapropriate /emotes will be common sight if these control features were impllemnted.
how would wasd movemant make running possible? the devs allready stated there will be no running, no dancing, no jumping.
From what I see in the trailer they are moving in arcs, thus it is WASD movement like the person above me stated.
|

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 01:54:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Ominus Decre
Originally by: Asheyla Vareen
GOOD! I'll do a happy little jig right here at my desk, then. Also, I want to also ask the devs not to make it a click to move type of ambulation. There is nothing more annoying on this planet than click to move functions. I would lobby for the more realistic WASD, or arrow key movement feature.
EDIT: And character names and corp/alliance tickers floating over their heads = please no.
I completely disagree. WASD controls would likely cause me to NEVER use an avatar function in EVE. For one, it's a total distraction from the core play style (point and click) interface that make up the game.
it would be more immersive and intuitive to the standard theme of the game to facilitate a point and click movement for avatars. Being able to click on an object which would then have your character move towards and interact would be move nicer then twitchy WASD controls.
Jumping, running, twitch WASD controls and random innapropriate /emotes will be common sight if these control features were impllemnted.
point and click!!!! go play some ****ty Korean grinding MMO! take that dumb **** outside please. we don't want that in eve. I do NOT want eve to feel like
sword of the new world archlord other ****
|

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2008.01.23 17:25:00 -
[3]
Originally by: B1FF No need for a long post. I'm not crying like a little girl.
Your answers are indicative of the failure that is ambulation. Not a single pro-ambulation person has counted a single one of my points. So far the only arguments raised have been the following.
1. Shut up. 2. I want it. 3. It won't effect you. (This is hilarious because it's one of my points against it) 4. OMG I get to dance and play dress up! PONIEZ!
It's window dressing. Quote:
but one of your points was that people don't want it.
and it damn well seemed that people want it. as you stated it is one of the arguements for it. Meaning you fail.
|

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2008.01.23 19:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: B1FF
Originally by: Mica Swanhaven
but one of your points was that people don't want it.
and it damn well seemed that people want it. as you stated it is one of the arguements for it. Meaning you fail.
I've not used "I don't want it" as an argument. It's not. It's a position. You can't use a position as an argument. That's why I put it on the list.
to quote you
Quote: A lot of people don't want this. A lot of people will not enjoy this. The game is not about YOU
I want it.
this is not my arugemnt for why ambulation is good or bad. it's my counteragurment to you saying people don't want this. PEOPLE WANT THIS.
now weither or not it's a good or bad thing is different.
do you see why people are getting ****ed with you yet? it's really anoning to take a stand on something loike people want it and your counteragruement is that its stupid. WILL STILL WANT IT WETHER OR NOT IT IS STUPID.
|

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2008.01.23 19:45:00 -
[5]
Originally by: B1FF
Originally by: Mica Swanhaven
Originally by: B1FF
Originally by: Mica Swanhaven
but one of your points was that people don't want it.
and it damn well seemed that people want it. as you stated it is one of the arguements for it. Meaning you fail.
I've not used "I don't want it" as an argument. It's not. It's a position. You can't use a position as an argument. That's why I put it on the list.
to quote you
Quote: A lot of people don't want this. A lot of people will not enjoy this. The game is not about YOU
I want it.
this is not my arugemnt for why ambulation is good or bad. it's my counteragurment to you saying people don't want this. PEOPLE WANT THIS.
now weither or not it's a good or bad thing is different.
do you see why people are getting ****ed with you yet? it's really anoning to take a stand on something loike people want it and your counteragruement is that its stupid. WILL STILL WANT IT WETHER OR NOT IT IS STUPID.
So what if you want it? That's not an argument.
Why do people want it? No one has been able to say what it will add other than a 3D chat room. If you look at what CCP has said that's all it can be. We don't need a big chat room.
wow you don't get it do you... I'm arguing that people WANT it.
People WANT it. as in you said people DON'T want it. and I'm saying people DO WANT it.
as in I want it she wants it
your point was people DON'T want it.
measning your saying people don't want it and I disagree with you. I think people WANJT amubulation. you think peopl edon't WANT ambulation. thus a counter argument of "HEY! DON'T SAY PEOPLE DON'T WANT IT! PEOPLE DO!" is valid in the context.
I am not talking about if the game NEEDS it.
but that people WANT it.
of which you say peopl eDON'T WANT.
is this getting through at all?
|

Mica Swanhaven
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 15:56:00 -
[6]
Originally by: B1FF
Originally by: Robrina Brun
Ad Hominem attack, I know... but I calls it as I sees it.
At least you admit it. Yet you call me a troll.
I've stated my reasoning. Please read it.
Epic troll is epic :)
|
|
|
|